- PTLENS VS LIGHTROOM FULL VERSION
- PTLENS VS LIGHTROOM SOFTWARE
- PTLENS VS LIGHTROOM FREE
- PTLENS VS LIGHTROOM WINDOWS
jpg file) to sort through the images and pick out the keepers.
PTLENS VS LIGHTROOM WINDOWS
I use the stupid Windows photo viewer (The one that opens up by default when you double-click on a. I pull photos off my camera into a folder I've created for that shoot. Okay, I'm going to give away my super-secret workflow. The two combined are integrated nicely and give one the ability to do almost anything. I can also say that I use LR as the importing, organization, tagging and front end of my work flow and then a couple of quick steps in CS4 on some images. Since I already have CS3, it is hard to pull the trigger on Lightroom. I use Enfuse, CS3 and Capture NX which is Nikon's version of Viveza.Ĭapture NX is great for color management, lighting adjustments and sharpening (way better than CS3), but I still do most of the heavy lifting with CS3. I'm still learning both, it may take a year but they are the best darkroom I can imagine. Don't know how much that would cost, and I'd need to see just what else that gives me above PSE 5.ĬS4 and LR2 together are like going to war with lasers mounted on a space platform, nothing gets away from you. I've been thinking I might look to get ahold of a used copy of CS2. There are times when I wish I had some of the tools in Photoshop to make selecting easier, or to use in place of tedious cloning, but I get by all right. Does pretty well, mostly using Elements for cloning and layer masks as Larry says. I don't have true Photoshop, only Elements and LR.
PTLENS VS LIGHTROOM FREE
Many free video tutorials on using Gimp at : Originally posted ages ago. I use UFRaw for my raw processing and Gimp for post processing. Layering and about everything that Photoshop can do for Free. I buy the latest version of Photoshop because I am hopelessly addicted and I can't find a 12 step program for Photoshop!įor less you can use Gimp. Lightroom 2 + PTlens will get you by for real estate photography! You don't even need Photoshop Elements if you don't want to do extensive cloning or layer blending.
PTLENS VS LIGHTROOM FULL VERSION
There's probably no good business case for purchasing a full version of Photoshop CS4 when you can even do extensive cloning (like removing cars from driveways) and layer blending with Photoshop Elements for $99. What's the business justification for spending so much on Photoshop as far as PFRE is concerned? What do you do with Photoshop that can't be done with Lightroom? Namely, clone/heal, masking for local adjustments, etc.
It seems Lightroom 2.x does a lot of the things I used to buy Photoshop for.
PTLENS VS LIGHTROOM SOFTWARE
One such piece of software is PTLens, which includes the Samyang 14mm f/2.8 as one of it's profiled lenses.Here's a question inspired by another post. In this case you can rely on someone somewhere figuring out the set of parameters (usually called a profile) and posting them online. If your lens is fixed focal length and the distortion is independent of focus distance (which I think it largely is with the Samyang 14mm f/2.8) then one set of parameters can easily be applied to all images generated by all copies of the lens (that aren't decentered in some way). Therefore you need a piece of software/plugin that can do different types of distortion, along with the parameters of the distortion.
You can usually only tune one parameter of the correction so you'll never eliminate the moustache. The reason the Photozone review states that this distortion is difficult to detect, is that most software only offers very simple correction based on radially symmetric distortions based on simple formulas. It's very difficult to correct by hand, but very very easy for a computer to correct, given a formula for how the distortion behaves.
0 kommentar(er)
